FA Won’t Punish Racist Email Employee, and Other Thursday Notes

By: Noel | January 4th, 2012
   
luis suarez suarezgate

We wanted to talk about stuff that isn’t Luis Suarez. We really, really did. But that didn’t take into account one inescapable fact: Pretty much nobody is talking about Liverpool without also talking about Luis Suarez. So while the FA Cup draw against Oldham Athletic holds the potential for distraction on Friday, for now at least there’s little to do but tie up a few more of the Suarez-related loose ends…

* Following news that Liverpool have accepted Luis Suarez’ eight-match suspension, it has been reported that the group handing out Suarez’ punishment in an attempt to show that racism has no place in the English game has continued to employ a man who admitted to sending racist emails using his business account. Peter Brown, who works with the Bedfordshire FA and is set to retire soon, publicly apologised for the largely ignored incident early in the fall and offered to retire immediately, but not only did the English FA choose not to take him up on that offer—they failed to take action against him in any way. There was no fine or suspension, and Brown is expected to see out his duties until later in the year when he would have retired even if racist emails sent by him had not come to light.

Given that it would appear the rules for what is and is not acceptable are different for those who the FA might consider one of their own, the eventual fate of John Terry—who remains England’s captain despite video evidence he used racist language as defined by the English FA and is currently undergoing court proceedings that prevent the FA from handing out any kind of fine or suspension—will be a major litmus test. Both the media and FA will now be faced with deciding if all the recent talk of enlightenment and equality is genuine or if instead all their high-minded noise can again be easily set aside when the accused isn’t an outsider. And the early signs aren’t good for high-minded.

* As part of Liverpool walking things back from last week’s talk of fighting on the beaches, on the landing grounds, in the fields and in the streets, whatever the cost may be, Luis Suarez has followed up recent official statements with a brief not-quite-apology:

I admitted to the commission that I said a word in Spanish once, and only once. I never, ever used this word in a derogatory way and if it offends anyone then I want to apologise for that. I told the panel members that I will not use it again on a football pitch in England.

Which, of course, isn’t quite the same thing as a clear-cut apology for using the word in the first place, though of course by all accounts Suarez remains convinced that he didn’t actually say anything wrong—or at least that he didn’t say anything that was racist as far as he’s concerned. The club’s press release in the wake of the initial ruling may have embarrassingly played the “black friends” card, but regardless of that cringe-worthy misstep it’s not entirely unreasonable to speculate that a quarter-black player caught up in the whirlwind of the past few months, having grown up in a culture lacking England’s specific racially charged history from its role in the Atlantic slave trade through to this week’s conviction of two men for a murder in 1993 where institutional racism played a role in an initial failure of justice, might still be coming to grips with the idea that people and papers around the country are baying for his blood for having said a phrase that at worst might have still seemed to him far less inflammatory than what Patrice Evra said during their exchange. He’s now said a kind of sorry, then—an almost sorry—likely in the hopes of getting the press off his back, and perhaps at the urging of the club. Whether it works or simply leads to more attacks for not being quite the apology most would have been demanding remains to be seen, and the same could likely be said for the club as a whole concerning their recent about-face.

* Along with further news from Suarez and about the FA trickling out since yesterday, there has been discussion of just what Kenny Dalglish was hinting at when he said that there were things he and Liverpool would have liked to talk about but couldn’t in regards to the case following the Manchester City match on Tuesday. One of his most teasing lines suggested that despite the 115-page length of the document released by the FA to support the Suarez decision, there were important pieces of information—or at least pieces of information considered important by Liverpool—that had been left out.

That is believed to refer to Liverpool’s contention that Evra was guided through his witness statements by the FA while being allowed to watch footage of his confrontation with Suárez. The United defender did not, for example, recall being pinched by Suárez until after a review of the incident and that action formed a large part of the case against the Uruguayan.

The Liverpool striker’s request to study the same footage while submitting his statement, his club alleges, was refused. Suárez was subsequently described as giving “unreliable” and “inconsistent” evidence by the commission while Evra changed his initial allegation of being labelled a “nigger” by Suárez 10 times, and was deemed a credible witness.

If this is in fact the case, it’s doubtful that any Liverpool fans will actually be surprised. It’s also doubtful that any of the places that have called Suarez a racist in 64-point font on their back page will especially care, given that as it stands the FA’s report already at least took pains to distance themselves from dubbing Suarez an outright racist and that didn’t get in the way of a few good inflammatory headlines.

Right, so that’s it for Suarez. I swear I can stop talking about him any time I want. I mean, with Oldham on Friday, the transfer window opening, and Andy Carroll’s continuing development/lack of development as a Liverpool striker all likely to provide fodder in the coming week—well, it’s not like there’ll be a shortage of things to talk about. In the meantime, then, before we inevitably spend the next seven days talking about nothing but Luis Suarez…


Some Related Liverpool Posts:


Tags

   

  • I'm not
    finished read this yet, but it's so fabulous 'n I'll back again when I was
    finished my job :D

  • heitz11

    http://soccernet.espn.go.com/n...

    The article is calling for the FA to charge Liverpool and Kenny. If Liverpool disagrees with the way the trial was held they are then promoting racism and should be charged? This whole thing is a witch hunt, if you disagree with the FA you're a racist. It doesn't matter that Liverpool is upset about the way the trial was held, they are portrayed as upset because racism is not tolerated and every Liverpool fan or employee is a racist.

    ''Liverpool have been too keen to support their man and in doing so have whipped up a sense of paranoia amongst their fans."

    If anyone has paid attention to the trial and not just the end result and are upset with how it was handled, they are just paranoid.

  • Redarmy

    I don't know, I tend to agree with Mr. Powar on some points. He's right that LFC has been unprofessional in its handling of the whole matter.
    Kenny has been a little too outspoken about this thing from day one, where I think he kinda put himself in a corner where he had to keep on defending Luis. It's allright to support your player everyway possible, but in front of the media, a 'NO Comment' is usually the best comment

  • This is gonna be WAY off topic, but I think it's worth sharing...

    The Munich disaster was just covered on a documentary show I follow religiously, Mayday (known as Air Crash Investigations and Air Emergency in other parts of the world). The co-pilot unfortunately was killed by the impact so the captain of the flight, Captain James Thain, was the only surviving pilot of the doomed plane. The accident occurred in Munich, so the crash investigation was conducted by West German crash investigators. They were less interested in conducting a fair and honest investigation and more interested in laying the full brunt of the blame upon the good Captain.

    The eventual cause of the crash was found to be slush on the runway (the nose landing gear lifted up as it should, but then slammed back against the asphalt and the plane skidded out of control, off the end of the runway and into a house, consistent with it encountering slush during its takeoff roll and the resulting friction slowing it down dramatically), but the German head investigator was unwavering in his quest to lay the blame at Thain's door and instead pointed his finger at a thin layer of ice on the wings that he alleged the Captain neglected to de-ice before initiating takeoff. For the uninitiated, this is total arse gravy. Ice on the wings can reduce the wing's lift capability once airborne, but it does NOTHING to dramatically slow it down while it's still on the ground. But in 1958, the aerodynamic effect of icing wasn't as fully understood as it is today so the Germans were successful in pushing their agenda of demonizing the only surviving pilot. Slush on the runway would be the fault of the German airport, so the conflict of interest is quite clear there.

    As luck would have it, Mrs. Thain was a chemist who theorized that the ice was caused after the crash, by the fire extinguishers used by rescue crews. She conducted her own experiments with the main ingredient of the extinguishers used, sodium bicarbonate. At the same time, the RAF conducted experiments of their own, seeing how slush affects the takeoff performance of the Elizabethan, the aircraft in question. This evidence was brought to the attention of the German authorities. Their response? Quite predictably, scoffed at it and reiterated their fabricated guilt of James Thain. It wasn't until decades later, after he'd lost his job at the airline and his entire career as an airman, that his name was finally cleared.

    I want to stress that I am in no way minimizing or celebrating the loss of the Busby Babes; it was a tragedy for the sport no matter what team you support. But I can't help but wince at the parallels between Captain Thain's ordeal and the one Luis Suarez is currently forced into it, 54 years later. The British press was just as big a scavenger for headlines back then as it was today... they played no small part in the downfall of the poor man, just as they're doing to wee Luis as we speak.

    ...Fuck

  • alex_snow2

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?f...
    35:30 Evra is clearly seen calling then-Chelsea play Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink a "Motherfucking nigger", despite his claims as QUOTED in the FA's 115 page report that "I don't like using racist language."The FA came to their verdict on the BALANCE OF PROBABILITY - that is, they felt - as they said so themselves - that they felt Evra was a MORE TRUSTWORTHY person than Suarez and therefore more likely to be telling the truth. However, considering that Evra LIED during the hearing, this would completely rule out any kind of possibility that he could be more trustworthy. So how the fuck do they justify their verdict now?

  • Redarmy

    No need for justifications anymore. The ban was accepted.

  • tony

    No Bent, please. A stud in Ipswich. A dud in Tottenham. Then a stud again in Sunderland & Villa. Translation: stud in low level clubs, dud in top club. Unlike Dafoe, he didn't see openings as quick as Modric.

    With insufficient feeds from wingers, we will have Bent & Carroll idling & wandering in the box. Both do not hold the ball as well as Suarez. 

  • I think, at the end of this, the one thing that is abundantly clear is that Liverpool seriously need to fire their entire PR team. This whole thing was appallingly mishandled.

  • mardia

    Completely agree. Wherever you stand on Suarez's guilt or innocence, the club mishandled this so badly that I don't think its reputation is going to recover that easily.

  • Suarez from the car park...

    You have to also remember that ManUre have had a couple of runs at this with Evra.  So they know how it works now and took a straight path for maximum effect.

    But yes, the legal / pr team don't seem to be the sharpest sticks in the pack.  Probably missed out on suing the mancs for major wonga unfortunately.

  • skrtels clearance

    off topic, but who here wants us to sign darren bent? and how much for?....personallly i think he is better than carroll and will suit our style more, we have been crying out for someone who can score inside the box.

  • Redarmy

    I would want us to sign Bent for £15 million with Adam or Kuyt going the other direction. 

  • Bent isn't bad, exactly, but he's far from great. Plus he'd be expensive and has limited upside.

    The thought of what Liverpool could get for the £25-odd million it'd take to get Bent would be horribly depressing should it turn out to be more than rumours. Getting ripped off for another average British player would show that nobody running the show has learned a damn thing from the past 12 months.

  • fastrail

    Please for the love of God no!

  • Darren Bent? Since then did two wrongs make a right? 

    Please stop this insane "The best of British Experiment".

  • Seconded. Get me a player with a rolled R or an accented E in his name and I'm happy. Sorry, Mr. Taylor, if that was racist.

  • Suarez from the car park...

    Well Noel, it seems your post has been put up on several other sites (Niuzer and soccerblogs) regarding the racist email sent by Peter Brown as reported in the Mirror ref your link.  

    Interestingly the rest of the media which we can only describe as incredibly thorough and outspoken with high sensitivity/publicity issues, has not a word of it.

    Instead, the press and radio is full of the 'lamentable apology' made by Luis Suarez who I think actually comes across as a very genuine individual in his releases.

    It simply isn't feasible to accept that the rest of the media haven't seen the Mirror article regarding Peter Brown yet there is a stonewall silence to it.  This isn't just a conspiracy, it's far worse.  It's a total cover up to not allow the story to surface.  

    And as if all this wasn't sufficient, the media are reporting that Twitter users are jumping up and down saying Diane Abbott MP should resign for pronouncing a white divide and rule conspiracy - for which she is now apologizing.

    Conspiracy - maybe the media is too fragmented for that, but cover up - for sure.

  • Damu

    Sometimes I wish Luis had given Evra one smashing punch and taken a 3 match ban rather than get tagged with the bad name he has now. I have been continuously arguing with my friends about the entire farce of a trial and everyone has already branded him a racist. Hope he bounces back after this long lay-off and shows a metaphorical middle finger to every team that comes after that. A hat-trick at the Old Toilet will be extra special

  • Seanster

    Great piece again Noel. It seems the media bandwagon has moved from Suaraz bashing on to Liverpool/Dalglish's "blind/hypocritical/lamentable" backing of suarez in the face of "proof" (a word used in many of .

    Some incredibly biased and xenophobic articles doing the rounds at the moment. The balls that was the clubs disjointed defence of Suarez aside, I totally respect the stance in questioning the process which resulted in the ban and the backing of Suarez.

    In a way I'm reluctantly satisfied that Liverpool and Suarez have accepted the ban as it will bring some semblence of finality on whats been a horrible circus and fodder for a witchhunting, xenophobic media and an incredibly hypocitical FA to show itself as a bastion of riotousness on foot of Sepp Blatters ill advised comments.

    With Suarez lynched it seems Dalglish is up next for daring to question the FA's "proof". Its time for the club to step back and keep its counsel and no doubt the frenzy will die down after a few days. Suarez had been abused by a xenophobic media and away fans prior this this incident and i'tll be just more of the same when he returns. So the repercussions for the player on his return will hopefully be tolerable.

    An incredible precendent has been set by a self congratulatory FA, the repercussions of which we can only imagine. What if someone is actually caught on camera/microphone making a racist slur? An 8 game ban is based on "probable", surely a season or two for actual proof. In the meantime I'll deludedly side with my blind, misinformed, hypocritical club against the crusaders for good that are the FA and the British media.
     

  • Nic

    Just a quick warning for those that could be offended - look away now!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... 

    I hope Evra didn't offend himself?

    Seems he only knows 3 words in English, F**cking, Pussy and the N word!?

  • Neb

    You forgot mother...as in mother why did you treat me do bad that I now constantly look like I have a lemon wedged between my asshole...

  • Nic

    thanks neb

    and hasslebaink and lampard but hasslebaink is dutch right!? :)

  • fastrail

    Sorry if this is somewhat off topic
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... 

    Watch and enjoy :P

  • PDubz18

    Good lord I was confused for a second there, then I realized that they weren't actually the announcers lol

  • Deh deh deh deh-deh-deh... Luuuuuuuuis... Suaaaaaarez... ah fuck it, what's the point

blog comments powered by Disqus

Follow Us

           




England National Team News

Search The Offside


 




Related Links


Categories


Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email liverpool[at]theoffside[dot]com

Write for The Offside

Archives