Blog Pollin’: Steven Gerrard’s Best Position

By: Noel | March 1st, 2011
   

With a match against United coming up on the weekend and a handful of recent performances that have given cause to wonder just what Steven Gerrard’s best position is, this week’s question asks just that: What do you think the captain’s role is at this stage of his career?

He obviously still fancies himself a box-to-box, all action midfielder, though his recent displays in the center of the park have involved neither a wealth of his trademark bursting runs forward nor a great deal of defensive steel. Still, many imagined him moving towards a deeper midfield position as his capacity to make those constant forward runs diminished, and if he committed himself to the defensive side of the game and looked to play the safe ball when an obvious killer pass wasn’t on he undoubtedly has the talent to make the switch to a more central role as Paul Scholes* did a number of years ago. The main questions seem to be if the time for that change is now, and whether he’s willing to put in the work it will take to subjugate his natural instincts and approach the game from a slightly different angle to the one he’s used to.

If he’s determined to make the position his–despite not having played all that much of his career as a true central midfielder–then such an option still seems reasonable. Right now, however, there have to be reservations as to whether he’s willing to change the way he approaches the game, and moreover if he’s reached the stage where he needs to while there are other positions that might allow him to conserve his energy for shorter bursts without the need to drastically alter his approach.

The obvious option would seem to be a return to a more advanced role in a three (or four, in certain of the three center back formations) man midfield that largely removes the need for him to track runners after making a forward surge. It always surprised at first, but in 2008-2009 Xabi Alonso ran further than anybody on the pitch more often than not, and certainly he ran more than Gerrard did in support of Fernando Torres even if it was Gerrard’s short bursts that were more easily noticed. With Gerrard looking to play deeper now, he may actually be asked to run more than he was in an overwhelmingly attacking role, though it may be a case of slightly longer stretches at slightly lower speeds. Meanwhile, when you add in the demand for him to still make occasional attacking bursts if he isn’t to radically alter his game it means more running still, and it could be this as much as anything that has resulted in Gerrard putting in less effort on the defensive side lately–after all, an attempt to do everything can, in the end, result in doing nothing particularly well. For all that some saw a move back as inevitable as he grew older, it may be that in moving back he is now faced with a larger workload.

If he is no longer capable of combining the constant movement in defense and possession of a central midfielder with the bursting runs of the old, attacking Gerrard, then perhaps both Liverpool and his most profitable realisation would be that he should be moved forward to where he doesn’t need to worry defensively quite so much. After all, he’s never been the most interested player in the defensive side of the game, so if he only has the stamina for one role at this point in his career it might be best to make it the one he can do the most damage in. It might be hard for him–and for some observers–to let go of the idea that he has to be involved with absolutely everything, but if he isn’t willing or able to largely give up on the most offensive side of his game, then the only option may be moving forward.

Of course, one also shouldn’t rule out the option of him moving to the right, as arguably his most impressive season came from a fairly free wide role. In the end, though, it might be the switch we’re least likely to see. Still, it would allow him to utilise his at times deadly crossing ability with regularity, and to cut down on his defensive duties somewhat without completely giving up on involvement in early build-up play, and as such might offer somewhat of a compromise in both duties and expectations between the two more central roles. However, there often seems to be a psychological blockage that greets the idea of Gerrard moving to the right, some deep belief that to move him “outside” somehow takes him away from the fray where he belongs. It also would likely require Joe Cole to play a role in central midfield, and for many he remains an unproven player who hasn’t done much of note in the past three years and who has at times been accused of lacking game intelligence. Not to mention that with everybody fit it would likely mean Dirk Kuyt on the bench, and for all that many question his technical ability, it’s hard to imagine an argument better than “But Joe Cole is Joe Cole!” as to what Liverpool’s big summer signing has shown over the past few seasons to deserve a starting role more than the at times gangly Dutchman. In any case, it does seem an added gamble beyond the simple shock the idea of Gerrard on the right raises in some quarters, but perhaps for some it remains an intriguing gamble.

So: Let Gerrard stick to the middle, but insist he curtail his attacking intent so as to have the energy to involve himself in all the other necessary aspects of central midfield? Focus his energy on just the attack, even if it takes him away from the build-up he pines to partake in? Or roll the dice a bit and shift him wide in the hopes he can rediscover the best form of his career, even if it seems a bigger gamble across the board?

What’s best for Gerrard? But more importantly, what’s best for Liverpool in 2011? It is after all a new club in a new decade, one where only he and Carragher remain from those treble and Champions League winning sides. He’s still quite obviously a great player when he’s at his best, but it may be time to start looking at how he fits into the rest of the team rather than how the rest of the team fits around him.

*Yeah, sorry. But you come up with a more recent, more apt, and more appropriately British example. Besides, it’s fitting with the two sides facing off on the weekend.


Some Related Liverpool Posts:


Tags

   
  • Suarez from the car park...

    got to use his distribution skills further forwards. right side is perfect, his deliveries always yield results, partly because defenders have to look in two directions, at the ball and the guy running in.
    He's been very mediocre in the middle, too many hollywood passes. Raul and Lucas did really well together there, and Raul's got plenty of legs left to get forwards and back.

  • Guest

    One school of thought would be that Torres leaving Liverpool had to do with the realization (on 'Nando's part) that he'd never get to relive the partnership he had with Gerrard in the 08/09 campaign. Iniesta's comments this summer suggested that if there was one thing that kept Torres at Liverpool as long as he was, it was the potential to relive the experience of 08/09 WITH GERRARD IN AN ADVANCED ROLE. Which is to say, we may still have Torres today if Good Old Roy employed a Rafa-style 4-2-3-1, with Gerrard as trequartista and Torres as sole striker.

    The extent to which this unfortunate splitting up of Gerrard and Torres played in El Nino leaving ( We only played 4-2-3-1 in 15 of 38 league fixtures in 08/09 anyway) can be debated, but what cannot be debated, in my humble opinion, is how useful Gerrard proved as a #10/trequartista/second striker/CAM/whatever you'd like to refer to it as. And, as Noel alluded to above, advanced age impacts where a player ends up. Scholes fell further back, and became a deeper lying midfielder (he's also asthmatic), but if Gerrard is going to become more one-dimensional, its the attacking dimension that needs to be emphasized.

    Furthermore, it has also been mentioned on this site and in others how the best thing of the Hodgson era was the Meireles/Lucas partnership. Why break those two up and have Meireles further up, when they can complement each other, with Lucas pulling the strings with his passing while sitting deeper (a la Schweinsteiger) with Meireles as a box-to-box DM who can both shield the back four and provide offense with ghosting runs (Khedira). I'm not necessarily claiming that that Gerrard-Meireles-Lucas is equivalent to Ozil-Schweinsteiger-Khedira, but it's a pretty damn good nonetheless.

  • I vote that CM shouldn't even be an option.

    (PS: I really voted right wing)

  • Joel

    His position should probably depend on who we bring in over the summer- Aquilani's return, buying a winger, etc- and what formation we look to play. He can play 'CM' in a 433, albeit as the most advanced of the three and essentially as a CAM. However, Gerrard should not be near CM in any formation requiring an effective partnership- 4231, 4222, 442.

    Personally, I'm hoping that we move to a 433 and Gerrard can fill both the RW/RM role as well as one of the three in CM. When he does play in CM, he needs to be paired with two others who are an effective partnership, leaving Gerrard to roam as he pleases, since he obviously cannot be relied on positionally.

  • Dj-Chutfield

    psychological blockage bias as you put it is that Gerrard should ALWAYS be in the hole behind the striker(s) and Meireles should be back in central midfield where he can make his late runs and his incredible long-range shots and trademark volleys. If I were to pick the team, that's how I would pick it every time.

  • bro

    what peoples thoughts on mascherano if we were to make a bid??? he is a bentch warmer for barca and rumours are he may be on his way out. he left us because he realy wanted to play for them but not getting games. now arsenal are so called ready to make a 20 mill bid or could be a part of a deal for fabregas. would we want him back for leaving or would he want to come back to us. i would take him. dont think he suits the way arsenal play he can not pass like them.

  • Sure, but he also can't pass the way the Liverpool teams of old did, which is the sort of thing we all want to see moving forward. He's too one-dimensional, and against 95% of opponents I'd have Lucas as holding mid over him--which is the exact situation he faces at Barcelona stuck behind Busquets. After selling him to them for peanuts, no way would I pay more to get him back.

  • bro

    i see your point welll said! liverpool dont want to go and pay more then what we sold him for and also it amazing how lucas has transformed and was shadowed by are mid options but now would be picked over him. lucas passing now is some 1 of the best in the team he can not win a ball or challange like masherano but who needs that when we want to become a team that dont need to run after lost balls because we can keep it by pass and move on the ground. if change my opnion he would be good as a sub for a lower price then what we sold him for.

  • Adam

    Food for thought. I would entertain that, but let me assure you, it will not happen.

  • bro

    true. would be mad though

  • GNX09

    I was never a fan of Mascherano, I would not want to see him back here. Let him rot on the bench at Barca, I'm sure that's his preference anyway.

  • lfc80uk

    When Rafa played Gerrard out on the right, he scored more goals and and gave more assists! The figures don't lie!

    Meireles has been phenomenal in the role Gerrard wants as his own! At this stage it is about putting the team first regardless of where Gerrard prefers to play!

  • Russell

    I said CM because Meireles has been on fire so he should be pushed up. I would say RM because we need a crosser for Carroll, but that means if we were to play a 433 Poulsen would have to play. And I think everyone knows what's wrong with that.

  • bro

    i no that no one would think of this but onist kuyt works his socks off he is are fittist player. now he does not realy score but he does get important goals and his cross is bad but he can play decent balls along the ground he also wins balls or stops attacks by just pressing players and real hard work there for helping to maintain possession. he can go forward if asked or opertunity comes so can still be a goal thret but will be fit to get back. i onistly think kuyt would be made for mid and gerrard to take over on the right were he gets grate crosses in and can cut in for his striking ability and power drives without to much damage if he lost possession. that way poulsen can warm the bench were he belongs.

  • Liuliu152

    http://www.buyshopping.us
    HOT SELL Product Brand is below:
    UGG BOOT ,nike shoes,air jordan shoes,nike shox shoes,gucci shoes ,true religion

    jeans, ed hardy jeans,coogi jeans,affliction jeans, Laguna Beach Jeans,ed hardy

    T-shirts,Coogi T-shirts,Christian Audigier T-shirts,Gucci T-shirts,Polo T-

    shirts,coach handbag,gucci handbag,prada handbag,chanel handbag .
    Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
    UGG BOOT $50
    Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
    Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $35
    Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
    Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30
    Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $16
    New era cap $15
    Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $25
    free shipping
    http://www.buyshopping.us

  • LFC4LIFE

    which one of therm aren't fakes?

  • Anurag

    Our Squad

    Aurelio - Injury prone.

    Poulsen - Just not good enough

    Jovanovic - Not good enough

    Kuyt - Well people might get hysteric here, but he is not up to the mark! he is a good pro, and i would even retain him in the squad for the kind of impact he creates in the dressing room. But yes, as a squad player getting 20-25 matches in a season.

    Maxi - lost ! no impact in the middle + no pace either

    Skrtel - AMy be too early to call his head, but not good enough. when Carra got injured he had the oppertunity to step up and Marshall the defense, but he made a jack of it.

    Agger- again , pure class, but injury prone, cannot expect more than 35 games per season from him.

    Carra - Gettin old, will lose pace next season ,again can be taken in as a stop gap solution at the centre back as well as at the right back position + can be taken into a coaching role as well.

    Cole- again a classy player, but the class seems to be eluding him since a couple of years now! anyway could come in handy for 35 games in a season. can be employed at the right, left and centre attacking position. could be beneficial because of his english tag.

    We have too many fractured player profiles in here.

    If LFC have to compete for the major honours in future, we got to solve these problems - If I got to chose 4 out of these 5 , I would pick

    1. Carra - undeniable influence on and off the pitch. would be handy for the next 2 years.
    2. Agger - Class. Period. We wont be able to replace him
    3. Kuyt - Work rate. again unquestionable commitment.
    4. Cole - English, has good two years in him. Can play in multiple positions.

    Which means
    Skrtel, Poulsen, Aurelio, Jovanovic, Maxi - will have to be replaced.

    Skrtel - Showcross
    Poulsen - Adam
    Maxi- Ashley young
    Jovanovic- hazard/sanchez
    Aurelio - Coentra

  • Lfc family ynwa;

blog comments powered by Disqus

Follow Us

           




England National Team News

Search The Offside


 




Related Links


Categories


Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email liverpool[at]theoffside[dot]com

Write for The Offside

Archives